The cover image may be different.

The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--But Some Don't

Paperback - 03 February 2015
Silver, Nate (Author)
Rp 357,000
No Hidden Cost
Or  714 PEC Points
New Free Shipping.
* Terms and Conditions
Delivered in :

20 - 40 business days (Others)

Customers who bought this also bought

Other items that might interest you

Description

UPDATED FOR 2020 WITH A NEW PREFACE BY NATE SILVER

One of the more momentous books of the decade. --The New York Times Book Review

Nate Silver built an innovative system for predicting baseball performance, predicted the 2008 election within a hair's breadth, and became a national sensation as a blogger--all by the time he was thirty. He solidified his standing as the nation's foremost political forecaster with his near perfect prediction of the 2012 election. Silver is the founder and editor in chief of the website FiveThirtyEight.

Drawing on his own groundbreaking work, Silver examines the world of prediction, investigating how we can distinguish a true signal from a universe of noisy data. Most predictions fail, often at great cost to society, because most of us have a poor understanding of probability and uncertainty. Both experts and laypeople mistake more confident predictions for more accurate ones. But overconfidence is often the reason for failure. If our appreciation of uncertainty improves, our predictions can get better too. This is the "prediction paradox" The more humility we have about our ability to make predictions, the more successful we can be in planning for the future.

In keeping with his own aim to seek truth from data, Silver visits the most successful forecasters in a range of areas, from hurricanes to baseball to global pandemics, from the poker table to the stock market, from Capitol Hill to the NBA. He explains and evaluates how these forecasters think and what bonds they share. What lies behind their success? Are they good--or just lucky? What patterns have they unraveled? And are their forecasts really right? He explores unanticipated commonalities and exposes unexpected juxtapositions. And sometimes, it is not so much how good a prediction is in an absolute sense that matters but how good it is relative to the competition. In other cases, prediction is still a very rudimentary--and dangerous--science.

Silver observes that the most accurate forecasters tend to have a superior command of probability, and they tend to be both humble and hardworking. They distinguish the predictable from the unpredictable, and they notice a thousand little details that lead them closer to the truth. Because of their appreciation of probability, they can distinguish the signal from the noise.

With everything from the health of the global economy to our ability to fight terrorism dependent on the quality of our predictions, Nate Silver's insights are an essential read.

Customer Reviews

1 customer reviews Between 4−5 stars rating, 22 November 2017
statistical applied to politics
By: Antonius B.

If you are confused about 2017 election, of why something that is not likely to happen actually happening, it is interesting to re-read this book. Nate Silver gets a a lot of blame for first giving Donald Trump 33 percent chance of winning and then failing to predict DT’s winning. But that’s not true, that’s just a bad understanding of statistic. 33 percent chance of winning doesn’t mean that Clinton has a lead of 30 percentage points but that if the election is being played out a hundred-time, DT will win 33 times. This is the premise of this book; statistic is weird.

That being said, it is interesting to talk about how quotative data can fail us.... See More

All of the poll has hilarry winning by few percentage points but doesn’t seem to notice that people lies in their polls. This is a failing across all statistical model and Nate Silver don’t see a way out of this hole.

Share your thoughts with other customers:
Write a Customer Review